DE 2014 – Receiver’s Motion to (1) Approve Proposed Plan of Distribution and (2) Authorize First Interim Distribution…
DE 2013 – PAPERLESS ORDER granting [2012] Receiver’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to (1) Approve Proposed Plan of Distribution and (2) Authorize First Interim Distribution (“Distribution Motion”). The Receiver shall file his Distribution Motion on or before August 23, 2024. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 8/16/2024. (mei)…
DE 2012 – Receiver’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion to Approve Proposed Plan of Distribution and to Authorize First Interim Distribution…
DE 2011 – Notice of Scheduling Mediation in Connection with Motion to Approve Settlement with Eckert Seamans…
DE 2009 – PAPERLESS ORDER denying [2008] Parker Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Motion to Stay and Requiring Mediation (“Motion”). “Courts have distilled three major grounds justifying reconsideration: (1) an intervening change in controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence; and (3) the need to correct clear error or manifest injustice.” Seff v. Broward Cnty., No. 10-61437, 2011 WL 13111723, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 19, 2011). The Parker Plaintiffs have not presented any such grounds here. Instead, they merely “ask the Court to rethink what the Court already thought through–rightly or wrongly.” Am. Univ. of Caribbean, N.V. v. Carital Healthcare, Inc., No. 08-20374, 2011 WL 13174780, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 17, 2011). Simply put, that is not the purpose of a motion for reconsideration. Further, while the Court is aware of the Parker Plaintiff’s concerns regarding discovery, the Court does not find that these discovery issues will be an impediment to mediation. Indeed, the Court is confident that the parties can address concerns regarding the Receiver’s claims against Eckert Seamans and the contention that Eckert Seamans constitutes part of the Receiver’s estate, as well as any related class concerns, during mediation before Michael Hanzman. Accordingly, the Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. The parties shall proceed to mediation in good faith and with a commitment to transparency as directed by the Court in its Order Granting Motion to Stay and Requiring Mediation [ECF No. 2006]. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 8/2/2024. (mei)…
DE 2008 – Parker Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Motion to Stay and Requiring Mediation…